Now

Sure, the negative stuff is below.

But I'm absolutely giddy of the idea of seeing Obama address a joint address to Congress. It's like the inauguration all over again.

How does the Al-Qaeda propoganda machine match this? Shouldn't the oppressed of the Middle East realize that Islam is a broken ideology and American secularism is the way to go?

What's particularly amazing is that Obama's race is no longer such a big deal. We've come far enough as a country that the focus is now shifted to the economy. What can the president do for the people? That is now far more important than what interest or racial group he belongs to.

This is what makes America, and democracy, great.

Dating and the singularity

People ask why I am so obsessed with the singularity. My answer is that traveling around the world and paying attention to current events without minding political correctness or victim ideology has made me realize that human beings are seriously fucked up. Evolution is a series of selfish genes, not directed by any central intelligence. Humans are not designed to be in the image of god. We are bags of chemicals and DNA that are capable of unlimited cruelty.

Denial of human reality is manifested in the modern day dating debacle following the feminist revolution.

The problem? Women reward bad people with sex.

I'm an avid Roissy reader, but he just hit one out of the park and it's necessary that you read this in order to confront the dark side of human nature.

Hitting a woman will turn her on"

An important quotes:


I am not claiming that women WISH to be beaten. Naturally, if you ask a woman, she will say “No way I don’t want to be beaten!”. What I do claim is that despite a woman’s conscious feelings towards abusers, her loins and her heart melt for men who abuse them, as can be seen by not only their return trips to the poisoned well (50% of women return to their abusive lovers), but by their very REAL and GENUINE love for their violently abusive lovers. Nothwithstanding to the contrary all the feminist squid ink attempting to whitewash in proper PC politesse why women go back to men who hit them, the simplest, and most parsimonious explanation, is that women return to abusers because THEY LOVE THEM. They are drawn to them. I have looked into the eyes of women who were in relationships with men who hit them, and I saw love. True, deep, fathomless love. If you have ever seen the eyes of a woman in love, you’ll know what I mean. They look as if they’re cavorting on another plane of existence.

Even beautiful women like Rihanna, with nearly illimitable options on the sexual market and an extensive support network that would protect her from abusive boyfriends, cannot help but keep going back to the man who hits her. Rihanna is said to be lonely without Chris Brown. She could have almost any man, but she chooses the man who punched her in the face.


Human nature is hell. Free will does not exist. Rationality is a farce. Equality is a myth. The human idealism of leftist ideology and the resistance to change of conservatism are both based on a false premise: that humanity is capable of creating a better world.

This deep insult to our values infects the world we live in. Where women with access to all the men and money in the world go to men who hit them. When drug dealers in mexico recently returned from a beheading, mafia in russia and terror sheiks in the middle east all have access to the beautiful women of the world who happily submit themselves, what has our species become?

This is why I eagerly await the end of the human era. I am not proud to be human. My species is not worth saving and I think machines making logical decisions with moral programming will be far better beings than humans ever could. Don't be afraid. If we change things can only get better.

Don't hold on to the past if it is not worth saving.

Modern day implications of Darwin and Lincoln: Part II

So unfortunately I don't have the time to write another post so I'm going to put some links down. Connect the dots and you'll find a long narrative connecting shocker race differences in IQ with shocker the singularity.

Sailer on evolution continuing

Race does exist

Darwin's enemies on the left

Sailer on the whitewashing of Darwin

Resisting looking into race and IQ is a losing proposition

Robots are getting better

New innovations make artificial limbs

Was Lincoln a racist?

Head Start Falls further behind

A-Rod and steroids

Darwin and designer babies

Designer babies are here

Evolution has been SPEEDING UP

What do women want?

Holder's absured outburst

Darwin's Descent of Man

Modern day implications of Darwin and Lincoln: Part I

So on the occasion of the just passed birthday of Darwin AND Lincoln it is appropriate to reflect on their lives and the implications of what they did.

These were two phenomenal men. One of them kept the Union together and freed the slaves. The other revolutionized biology and convulsed religion.

But their legacy remains obscured. Why? Because both men, while the objects of admiration from the left, are deeply misunderstood.

Both men had very different racial views from today's prevailing wisdom. And they happen to have been right.

I'll be honest. As a perennial fan of evolutionary biology and psychology, I always knew that evolution had more to say about race than what we let on. Humans magically didn't stop changing after they branched out from Africa.

And I knew that Lincoln did not have the highest opinion of African Americans, even though he thought they had inherent rights.

But what I didn't do was put it into context. We have just sworn in the first African American President of the United States who used Lincoln's Bible to assume office. Lincoln happened to be born in the same year as Charles Darwin.

So let's dive into it. I'm going to take Lincoln quotes from a recent root article to save myself and yourself the hassle of searching.


"There is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”


Woah! Come again?

Apparently Lincoln took the unlivability to heart


Even as he was writing the Emancipation Proclamation during the summer of 1862, Lincoln was working feverishly to ship all those slaves he was about to free out of the United States. So taken was he with the concept of colonization that he invited five black men to the White House and offered them funding to found a black republic in Panama, for the slaves he was about to free. Earlier, he had advocated that the slaves be freed and shipped to Liberia or Haiti. And just one month before the Emancipation became the law of the land, in his Annual Message to Congress on Dec. 1, 1862, Lincoln proposed a constitutional amendment that would “appropriate money, and otherwise provide, for colonizing free colored persons with their own consent, at any place or places without the United States.”


No complaints here. That would have been quite useful.

But you know what? Despite the fact that Lincoln believed this, what makes him more amazing is that he pushed an unpopular policy of giving African Americans citizenship, realizing that ultimately in order to redeem the promise of the American revolution he couldn't lead a country where people were born without freedom.

End of Part I

The individual takes a hit

So now that people will have to report their location to their loved ones.

Individual Liberty. R.I.P.

Welcome to Gaia.